SYMBOLIC CONVERGENCE IN THE INDEPENDENT MEN OF FLOBAMORA COMMUNITY

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

William Gilbert Killa
Petrus Ana Andung
Felisianus Efrem Jelahut

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the fantasy themes that are formed and build cohesiveness and describe the symbolic convergence that is formed in the Independent Men of Flobamora community. The theory used is symbolic convergence theory. This research is a qualitative descriptive study with a fantasy theme analysis method, which uses data collection techniques using observation, focus group discussions, interviews, and document study. The research results show that the Independent Men of Flobamora community in building its cohesiveness occurs in a continuous process. starting from the process of forming a collective identity which is the basis for creating fantasy themes. The process of forming a collective identity and cohesiveness begins with the stigma and discrimination experienced by members of the Independent Men of Flobamora community. This experience is shared in a message exchange process which then experiences message dramatization followed by the creation of symbolic interactions that lead to symbolic convergence. The dramatized message gets responses from other participants which form a series of fantasies.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Killa, W. G. ., Andung, P. A., & Jelahut, F. E. (2023). SYMBOLIC CONVERGENCE IN THE INDEPENDENT MEN OF FLOBAMORA COMMUNITY. ASPIRATION Journal, 4(2), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.56353/aspiration.v4i2.69

References

  1. Bormaan, Ernest G. & Nancy G. Bormann. (1991). Retorika Suatu Pendekatan Terpadu. Edisi 4. Jakarta: Erlangga
  2. Denzin, Lincoln. (2009). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  3. Faturochman. (2009). Pengantar Psikologi Sosial, Cetakan 2. Yogyakarta: Pustaka
  4. Gadamer, Hans Georg. (2004). Truth and Method. New York. by Sheed & Ward Ltd and the Continuum Publishing Group
  5. Harapah, Nursapia. (2020). Penelitian Kualitatif. Cetakan Pertama. Sumatera Utara: Wal Ashri Publishing.
  6. Haryono, Cosmas. Gatot. (2020). Ragam Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Cetakan Pertama. Sukabumi: CV Jejak.
  7. Ife, Jim & Frank Teseoriero. (2016). Community Development: Alternatif Pengembangan Masyarakat Di Era Globalisasi. Cetakan 3. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  8. Ismail, Zulkifli. (2021). LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Biseksual dan Transgender): Sebuah Dunia Abu-abu Subkultur yang Dianggap Menyimpang. Bojonegoro: Madza Media.
  9. Littlejohn, Stephen W. & Karen A. Foss. (2009). Teori Komunikasi Theories Of Human Communication. Edisi 9. Jakarta: Selemba Humanika
  10. Maryam, Effy W. (2020). Buku Ajar Psikologi Komunikasi. Cetakan 1. Sidoarja: Umsida Press
  11. Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society. London: Hutchinson Radius.
  12. Mulyadi, Seto. (2016). Psikologi Sosial. Jakarta: Gunadarma
  13. Mulyana, Deddy. (2012). Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: PT
  14. Nugrahani, Farida. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Dalam Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa. Surakarta.
  15. Ritonga, Fajar U, Tuti Atika, Adil Arifin, Indra Fauzan. (2022). Intervensi Komunitas Dan Gerakan Sosial Birmingham Small Owner’s Motorcycle Siantar (Bom’s). Yogyakarta: Jejak Pustaka
  16. Samsu. (2017). Metode Penelitian (Teori dan Aplikasi Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, Miixed Methods, serta Research & Development). Jambi: Pusat Studi Agama dan Kemasyarakatan (Pustaka)
  17. Setuaningsih, Rila. (2019). Psikologi Komunikasi. Ponorogo: Unida Gontor Press
  18. Surokim. (2016). Riset Komunikasi: Strategi Praktis Bagi Peneliti Pemula. Jawa Timur: Pusat Kajian Komunikasi Publik Prodi Ilmu Komunikasi, FISIB-UTM & Aspikom Jawa Timur
  19. Suparman, Ujang. (2020). Bagaimana Menganalisis Data Kuanlitatif. Bandar lampung: Pustaka Media
  20. Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Edisi ke-3 Cetakan ke-2. Bandung: Alfabeta CV
  21. Ward, Creswell. John. (2014). Penelitian Kualitatif & Desain Riset Memilih di Antara Lima Pendekatan. Edisi ke-3.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  22. Walgito. Bimo. (2002). Pengantar Psikologi Umum. Yogyakarta: Andy Offset
  23. Winarni, Endang Widi. (2018). Teori dan Praktik Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, PTK, R & D. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.