THE JOURNALISTS HAS BUILT SELF MEANING: SPREADING HATE SPEECH IN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 2019 IN BANTEN

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

ASPIRATION Journal Vol.1(2) November 2020
Published Apr 4, 2022
https://doi.org/10.56353/aspiration.v1i2.13
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020): November Edition of ASPIRATION Journal

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Liza Diniarizky Putri
Universitas Serang Raya, Indonesia
Annisarizki Annisarizki
Universitas Serang Raya, Indonesia
Dicky Andika
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia

Abstract

The current mass media industry is not the only sovereign of the source of informations. Based on technological advancements, social media exists as a blurring medium for space and time constraints in disseminating and exchanging information, but the minimal control mechanism causes content on social media is not only be positive, but also can be negative such as the spread of hate speech. Hate speech also enlivening journalist's Facebook accounts in Banten, especially during the 2019 Presidential Election campaign which tends to be a "new weapon" of social movements. This research was conducted with qualitative research methods through a phenomenological research approach. By using Social Construction Theory as a frame of qualitative analysis, it was revealed that the journalists who spread hate speech through social media Facebook interpret themselves as agents of change who do not want Indonesia to be led by the wrong leader.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Putri, L. D., Annisarizki, A., & Andika, D. (2022). THE JOURNALISTS HAS BUILT SELF MEANING: SPREADING HATE SPEECH IN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 2019 IN BANTEN. ASPIRATION Journal, 1(2), 185–210. https://doi.org/10.56353/aspiration.v1i2.13

References

  1. Ameidyo, D. & Y. (2019). Hasil Survei: Media Sosial Mempengaruhi Pilihan saat Pemilu. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from katadata.co.id website: https://katadata.co.id/berita/2019/04/05/hasil-survei-media-sosial-mempengaruhi-pilihan-saat-pemilu
  2. Annur, C. M. (2019). Survei APJII: Penetrasi Pengguna Internet di Indonesia Capai 64,8%. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from katadata.co.id website: https://katadata.co.id/sortatobing/digital/5e9a51915cd3b/survei-apjii-penetrasi-pengguna-internet-di-indonesia-capai-648
  3. Berger, P. L. T. L. (2012). Tafsir Sosial Atas Kenyataan. Risalah tentang Sosiologi Pengetahuan (Terjemahan). Jakarta: LP3ES.
  4. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (2016). The social construction of reality. In Social Theory Re-Wired: New Connections to Classical and Contemporary Perspectives: Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775357
  5. Brison, S. (2013). Hate Speech. International Encyclopedia of Ethics, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee771
  6. Castells, M. (2009). Communications Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. Dijk, J. Van. (2006). The Network Society. Social Aspects of New Media. In The New Faces of Victimhood: Globalization, …. California: Sage Publications.
  8. Djatmika, P. (2004). Strategi Sukses Berhubungan Dengan Pers dan Aspek-Aspek Hukumnya. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
  9. Habiba Makarim, N., Dimyati, D., Zukhruf Kurniullah, A., Utara Malaysia, U., Sintok, U., & Darul Aman, K. (2020). The Use of Instragram Account in Constructing the Concept of Beauty: A Case on “UNPAD GEULIS". ASPIRATION Journal.
  10. Kartz, B. (1994). Komunikasi Bisnis Praktis. Jakarta : Pustaka Binaman Pressindo.
  11. Kuswarno, E. (2007). Tradisi Fenomenologi pada Penelitian Komunikasi Kualitatif: Sebuah Pedoman Penelitian dari Pengalaman Penelitian. Sosiohumaniora.
  12. Kuswarno, E. (2009). Fenomenologi (Konsepsi, Pedoman, dan Contoh Penelitian). Bandung: Widya Padjajaran.
  13. Lexy J. Moleong, D. M. A. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). PT. Remaja Rosda Karya. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.02.055
  14. Mandiberg, M. (2012). The social media reader. In The Social Media Reader.
  15. Meyrowitz, J. (1998). Multiple media literacies. Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1998.tb02740.x
  16. Ngangi, C. R. (2011). Konstruksi sosial dalam realitas sosial. Agri-Sosioekonomi, 7(2), 1–4.
  17. Pamela, J. Shoemaker. & Stephen, D. R. (1996). Mediating The Message : Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content. United States: Longman Publishers.
  18. Pertiwi, W. K. & O. Y. (2019). PENGGUNA MEDIA SOSIAL SUDAH MENEMBUS ANGKA 3,5 MILIAR Hampir Setengah Penduduk Bumi Sudah “Melek” Media Sosial. Kompas.Com. Retrieved from https://tekno.kompas.com/read/2019/07/20/16370017/hampir-setengah-penduduk-bumi-sudah-melek-media-sosial
  19. Ritzer, G. (1985). Konstruksi Sosial Peter L. Berger Dan Thomas Luckmann. Sosiologi Ilmu Pengetahuan Berparadigma Ganda.
  20. Sliusarenco, D. (2018). HATE SPEECH AND INCITEMENT TO DISCRIMINATION. Moldova.
  21. Solis, B. (2012). The Rise Of Digital Influence. Retrieved April 16, 2018, from briansolis.com website: https://www.briansolis.com/2012/03/social-media-is-about-social-science-not-technology/
  22. Wearesosial Hootsuite. (2019). Berapa Pengguna Media Sosial Indonesia? Databoks.Katadata.Id. Retrieved from https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2019/02/08/berapa-pengguna-media-sosial-indonesia
  23. Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2011). Mass media research: an introduction. In Wadsworth Series.
  24. Zohar & Marshall. (2000). SQ: Spiritual intelligence: The ultimate intelligence. Psychology and Psychotherapy.